students and teachers already using it
Criterion-based feedback built for serious revision
Essay feedback that feels like a marker's desk, not a noisy AI dashboard.
Criteria Guru gives MYP students a cleaner read on the rubric: what is already working, what is limiting the score, and which revision move matters next.
Sign up in seconds. Two free essay markings, up to 500 words each. No credit card. No essay ghostwriting.
typical turnaround for a full review
coverage across the full MYP range
feedback framed around the rubric
Criterion snapshot
The review reads like an annotated scoring conversation: calm, structured, and precise enough to revise from immediately.
Marker note
Analysis is strongest when evidence circles back to the global context. Criterion B would climb if the claims were sequenced with sharper transitions.
- Pin the thesis earlier.
- Thread evidence into interpretation.
- End each body paragraph with impact.
Subjects in rotation
Why this lands
A calmer layout, a stronger hierarchy, and a page that reads like a real evaluation workflow.
Instead of stacking generic marketing blocks, the page now moves from proof to process to trust in the same visual language: editorial type, warm paper tones, mono annotations, and card surfaces that echo a reviewed script.
Core benefit
IB-aligned reading, not generic scoring
Every section is framed around how MYP criteria are interpreted, so students can see the difference between a vague comment and a usable rubric note.
Core benefit
Feedback that teaches instead of ghostwriting
The product points to structure, evidence, reasoning, and clarity. It does not hand students copyable prose or shortcut the thinking.
Core benefit
Fast enough for real revision loops
Students can upload, review, revise, and check again before submission, which turns the rubric into a drafting tool instead of a post-mortem.
Process
Multiple AI agents review, compare, and converge the feedback before you revise.
Instead of relying on a single pass, Criteria Guru uses multiple AI agents to read the same essay, compare where their judgments align or differ, and combine those signals into one tighter, more actionable feedback brief.
Upload the essay draft
Paste text or upload a document, then choose the MYP subject and level you want read against the rubric.
Multiple AI agents review in parallel
Specialized AI reviewers read the same draft through the lens of the MYP criteria, so the feedback is tested from more than one angle before it reaches the student.
Compare, converge, and revise
We compare the different reviews, combine the strongest points, and converge them into one clearer revision brief showing what is working, what is limiting the score, and what to fix first.
Who it serves
One product, three different reasons to trust it.
For students
Turn vague criteria into a concrete revision brief.
See what examiners are looking for, where your draft is thin, and how to move the next version forward without guessing.
- Clear criterion-by-criterion notes
- Fast feedback before deadlines
- Confidence built from specific direction
For teachers
Give students a better first pass before final submission.
Reduce repetitive comments, reinforce classroom expectations, and keep the final feedback conversation focused on higher-order thinking.
- Teacher-safe guidance style
- Criterion consistency across drafts
- Less time spent repeating baseline advice
For parents
Support progress without crossing into shortcut territory.
The tool stays on the safe side of academic integrity by coaching improvement rather than producing polished answers for students to copy.
- No essay rewriting
- Privacy-first handling of work
- A calmer route to better drafts
Proof and reassurance
Strong feedback is only useful when people trust how it was made.
The product is intentionally framed around learning: no copy-ready essay writing, no shortcut posture, and no vague machine-sounding critique that leaves students guessing what to do next.
Teacher voice
“I want AI to help kids instead of spoiling them. I love that this gives advice instead of just fixing the errors for them.”
Ms. Sarah Jenkins, MYP Science Teacher
Trust signal
Teacher approved because it stays inside the learning process
The feedback model is built to show why a score holds, where evidence is thin, and which thinking habits students should improve next.
Trust signal
Private by default
Submitted work is handled with privacy safeguards and is not fed back into model training, so the essay remains the student's own.
Trust signal
Useful across multiple drafts
Because the response is structured and quick, students can compare versions and spot how changes affect the rubric outcome.
Pricing
Start free, move to per-essay or monthly plans, and scale up for classes when needed.
Short drafts can stay on the free tier. Longer essays, repeat revision, and class-wide access each have a clear pricing path without forcing everyone into the same plan.
Free
Try it with no commitment.
- 2 free trial essays
- Up to 500 words per essay
- No credit card needed
- No expiry on the trial credits
Pack A
For shorter essays.
- 5 essay credits
- Up to 3,000 words per essay
- Valid for 6 months after purchase
- Repurchasing extends existing credits by 6 months
Pack B
Most activeFor longer essays & IAs.
- 12 essay credits
- Up to 12,000 words per essay
- Valid for 6 months after purchase
- Repurchasing extends existing credits by 6 months
Teacher or group plan
Shared monthly access for classrooms and tutoring groups.
Each student gets their own monthly access while billing stays centralized and easy to manage.
| Teacher & Group Access | How to get started |
|---|---|
| Custom plan options for schools, teachers, and tutoring groups | Contact [email protected] for details. |
For any teacher or group plan, contact [email protected].
FAQ
Questions people ask before they trust the first upload.
What is Criteria Guru?
Criteria Guru is an AI-powered essay evaluation tool designed specifically for IB MYP students. It provides instant, criterion-based feedback on essays to help students understand their strengths and areas for improvement.
How does Criteria Guru differ from other AI writing tools?
Unlike tools that rewrite your work, Criteria Guru acts as a coach. We analyze and advise, never doing the work for you. Our feedback is based on official IB MYP criteria, helping you learn rather than take shortcuts.
Which IB subjects are supported?
Criteria Guru supports all MYP years (1-5) including Language & Literature, Individuals & Societies, Sciences, Arts, and Design.
How fast is the feedback?
You can receive comprehensive feedback within 5 minutes of uploading your essay, allowing for rapid iteration and improvement before final submission.
Is my data safe and private?
Yes. We strictly adhere to GDPR and SOC II principles. We do not use your submitted data or essays for training our AI models. Your work remains yours with industry-standard security measures.
Can teachers use Criteria Guru?
Absolutely. Teachers use Criteria Guru to help students self-check before final submission. It reduces repetitive feedback writing and reinforces classroom teaching with consistent, criterion-aligned feedback.
Testimonials
What students and teachers said before and after making this part of their workflow.
The earlier testimonial wall is back here near the bottom of the page, with the fuller comments from students and teachers who used the feedback to sharpen drafts, reduce marking repetition, and prepare more confidently.
Criterion A used to be a nightmare. This gives me more than a number of score. It actually showed me the specific bits I was getting wrong and how to fix them as well as further direction of my efforts.
It's hard to find tools that actually help teachers. I want AI to help kids instead of spoiling them. I love that this gives advice instead of just fixing the errors for them. It's exactly what my students needed.
I run all my history papers through this. It catches stuff and provides guidance on how to do it in a better way. I found the points totally missed so as to make the rubric actually make sense for me.
My English essay was a mess structure-wise. The breakdown for Criterion B was a total lifesaver. Therefore I have a chance to sharpen my skills on Criterion B.
Great for letting students self-check before the final submission. It gives them advice and shows them what to learn and improve. It also cuts down on the time I spend writing the same feedback over and over.
Strongly recommend this tool. It boosts my efficiency and confidence. It's super fast. I can get feedback, change things, and check again in minutes. Definitely helped me feel ready for the eAssessment.
Start here
Stop guessing the rubric. Start revising with a clear brief.
Upload a draft, see where the criteria tighten or loosen, and make the next version stronger while there is still time to improve it.